Ratso held a special mass to commemorate the third anniversary of the death of the old Pole. He wants to make him a Saint.
This is the guy who once and for all, slammed the door on civil autonomy and reproductive rights for women within the Catholic Church. This is a guy who not only watched, but helped, as a cabal of homosexual pedophiles took over the leadership of the church. This is the guy who exhorted his followers to eschew the separation of church and state and combine church and civil authority. This is the guy who had a "special" relationship with Catholic youth all over the World.
Yeah. Make him a Saint, along with that old slaver, Mother Teresa.
2 comments:
The catholic church has been covering up the truth for 2000 years.
http://www.holyblasphemy.com/diabolicalmimicry.htm
Bolded sections from the website above...
"It boils down to this: if Jesus Christ is the salvation, and God loves everybody, then Jesus cannot have been a historical person."
We know for a fact that Jesus was an actual historical person, because not only do the Gospel accounts provide references to historical persons; i.e. Pontius Pilate, Herod, Cesaer Augustus (verifying that it was a historical event that he was writing about), but other non-Christian historians wrote about him as well (Josephus, Tacitus, etc.). Why would a historian write about a mythological person as if he were a real person? He wouldn't. Secondly, Jesus said in the Gospels that salvation was for all. One does not make the other mutually exclusive.
"The historical Jesus has not reached everyone, and even those whom he has reached, have not unanimously accepted him; not necessarily out of malice or impurity, but for various socio-political environmental factors not under their control."
This is absolutely correct that the historical Jesus has not "reached everyone", no more so than the historical Martin Luther King can reach everyone. However, like King's, Jesus' adherants spread the word about him, and what he taught. Jesus, unfortunately, did not have the benefit of the modern media to spread his word. Jesus wasn't accepted, nor has everybody accepted King.
"If Jesus was a historical person, and what Christians claim, then God is a discriminating tyrant, who has already choosen his favorites and placed them with Christ's saving graces. If we agree, however, with St. Anselm and the general public about God being the absolute best idea that we can have, then he must be good and wise enough to provide an equal amount of salvation to all, which, of necessity, rules out the historical Christ."
God is not a discriminating tyrant. In fact, if God discriminated, then He would have continued to reveal Himself to the Jews, and the Jews alone, and would not have allowed Jesus followers to preach to the gentiles. However, in the book of Acts, we can read the verification of the todays truth that not everyone who believes in Christ as Messiah are not just Jews. In fact, don't we see a diversity among Christians? Didn't Paul preach to the Gentiles (meaning anyone who is not Jewish)? Who has God been discriminating against? God does have enough salvation for everybody - just not everybody chooses it. If you're going to live your life hating God, why would you want to spend all eternity with Him?
Christians are accused of so much hate, but don't you see the real hate in this blog? It's truly sad, and I will pray for you.
Post a Comment