Read this. What Fester is saying here, is that true authority must always be right. The silent subtext is that he is the true authority. Ergo. God Hates Fags.
You, get no recourse or input into what becomes, for all intents, the absolute truth. Fuck consensus. Democracy is not a Catholic concept. God will speak to you if you listen and what he'll tell you, is to believe Fester and do what he says. Whatever he says. Some pretty out there stuff. How come when Fred Phelps puts up a God Hates Fags website, everyone trips over themselves calling him a hate monger but when il Popo says it, it's golden. God Hates Fags.
Luckily, most people realize Popo is an evil, perverted, anal raper and blow off everything he says. Unluckily for a few, they will heed his call and end up with dilated sphincters and blood running down their leg. God Hates Fags.
If you think the Pope , Rick Warren, James Dobson, Jimmy Swaggart or Creflo A. Dollar are any different from Fred Phelps, you're dreamin'. God Hates Fags.
5 comments:
Your logic is flawed.
If something is absolute truth, how can there be recourse from it? To do otherwise is to deny the truth and live a lie. How can the truth be denied by any consensus otherwise? We can democratically vote that the Earth does not spin from east to west, yet the truth remains no matter how hard we wish it not to be.
Reading the gross mischaractization of the Pope and other notable Christians here, leads me to believe that most liberals aren't so much concerned about the truth as they are making sure it never gets heard. Because, yes, of course, we all know that "God hates fags" is the truth, and that the actions of a few sick individuals applies across the board.
Lastly, your flawed logic is further revealed by the hateful screed in this post towards the Catholic Church. How do you deal with the contradiction that somehow it's ok to call the Pope and other priests pedophiles, but its wrong to call Mrs. Obama a gorilla? Both are equally wrong, and its all hateful. But I'm curious about one thing. Why is this blatant double standard permitted?
Not every priest is gay but most of them are. Not every gay priest is a sexual predator but many have proven to be so.
We know that the pope is gay; he's never denied it, and that he has been very protective of sexual predators within the priesthood. We know that his current boyfriend is more than thirty years younger than he is. So he's not age appropriate. Ratzo is just a little more careful than most.
I think all priests should be required to clearly state what their sexual orientation is and exactly how they are moved to express their sexuality, otherwise the rigors of celibacy will surely continue to drive most priests into unsavory sexual behaviors.
"We know"? So who's "we"? From under what slimy rock did you get the idea that Pope Benedict XVI is homosexual? "He's never denied it."? Who has asked? I would like some credible proof, please. CNN, the NY Slimes, MSNBS, etc. will suffice. But they won't come anywhere near that stinking turd because its libel, and they know it.
Oh, and studies have shown that the number of homosexual priests is no greater than that of the rest of society. I heard that on the Lame Stream Media (ABC Radio news/AP radio news), believe it or not.
If you're allegations were true or even suspected, the Catholic-hating Lame Stream Media would have been all over it. Any chance to discredit the Church is too juicy to pass up. I think your either deluded, or a sad, hate-filled person.
By the way, you completely dodged my questions.
They never mention the sexuality of Catholic Churchmen in the American press. Most of the American bishops are gay. John Paul was careful not to appoint too many.Benedict will probably appoint more. They are much more liberal about it in Europe. Of the last three Popes, it has been widely reported that Ratzo and Pauley were homos and the Big Pole liked the ladies.
Ratzo's current boyfriend is Georg Ganswien. You can look him up and see what you think. There's always plausible deniability there. There's no photos of them fucking on the beach but it's pretty clear what's going on.
I have an open mind, so I searched on Georg Ganswien. I know nothing about him. And I could find next to nothing after a google search (I used the terms "Georg Gaenswein" and "Georg Gaenswein gay".
My results. Hmmm. I found a gay blog that talked about him (bestweekever.tv). Certainly not investigative journalism there. A wiki entry of about a paragraph. Nothing substantial given the guys academic and theological chops.
Then there is this Time magazine article didn't say anything about their sexual preferences. They just gushed about how handsome he is. Maybe the author is gay. http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1728239,00.html
And this NY Newsday article, entitled "Pope Benedict's hunky private secretary has his own following".
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2008/04/21/2008-04-21_pope_benedicts_hunky_private_secretary_h-2.html
It doesn't mention anything about either of them being homosexuals. The comments are loaded with those, however, and we know how reliably accurate they can be.
I found nothing reliable whatsoever, only blogs that make the allegation that Msgr. Gaenswein is gay.
Just because a priest is young and "handsome" doesn't mean he's gay. Priests don't have to look like old sourpuss's, contrary to Catholic-haters beliefs. Gays constantly look for hidden signs in others who are not "outed", to justify their own homosexualnees. I know, I've had a few gay friends, dear ones, in fact. (Gasp! A right-winger Catholic who has gay friends! How is that possible?! They're such gay-bashers!) And that's what they do to assuage the guilt they feel.
Stop being such a hater, and get off the Pope-is-gay bullshit. You can't prove it. Rumour/gossip doesn't cut it. If you have something substantial, then let's see it. Otherwise, your allegations are nothing more than hate-speech.
Post a Comment